22 Augmented Reality Ethical Reasoning Labs

Emily York and Shannon Conley, ISAT

Introduction and Rationale: Augmented Reality Ethical Reasoning LabsWith the goal of engaging students in critical analysis of the social and ethical dimensions of technology, this ACT Grant would support the development of two flexible, interactive Augmented Reality (AR) labs in our new, dedicated lab space: a Scenario Analysis Lab, and a Design Fiction Lab.

 

This project supports our teaching in anticipatory ethical reasoning and science & technology governance. Anticipatory ethical reasoning refers to ethical reasoning applied to mid- to long-term technological trajectories. To engage in such ethical reasoning meaningfully, such trajectories have to be imagined and articulated based on research and grounded analysis of the social, political, economic, environmental, technological, and legal factors that may shape a trajectory in a particular way. Once plausible trajectories can be identified and described, the social and ethical implications of the technology in question can be analyzed. Insights from this analysis can then inform technology design and governance—policy, regulation, and best practices aimed at guiding responsible innovation.

 

In 2018, we obtained a grant to pilot a pedagogical approach that blended three tools to engage students in developing anticipatory ethical reasoning: scenario analysis, design fiction, and the 8 Key Questions. We refer to this blended strategy as Creative Anticipatory Ethical Reasoning (CAER). Scenario analysis is a structured process emerging from business consulting to identify and analyze key drivers of social and technical change to inform planning. Design fiction is a blend of science, science fiction, and design prototyping that juxtaposes 2D and 3D elements to visualize and facilitate critical thinking about plausible future scenarios. The 8 Key Questions refers to JMU’s signature heuristic for engaging in ethical reasoning developed by Ethical Reasoning in Action.

 

We developed a CAER module to test in five sections of a course we both teach. In this module, students researched an emerging technology; used scenario analysis to identify, analyze, and describe plausible trajectories for their emerging technology; then created design fictions to further elaborate, visualize, and engage each other in discussion about one of the scenarios; and finally used the 8 Key Questions to interrogate the design fiction as a way to assess the social and ethical implications of their technology. In this pilot version, CAER was done in the classroom using white boards and traditional arts and crafts materials. While these materials were effective in terms of achieving CAER’s learning objectives, there are several challenges: 1) the materials have to be purchased anew for each class of students; 2) they are messy and difficult to move; 3) their low-tech nature and association with artistic skill can be a barrier for some STEM students; 4) and the final products are not physically robust or flexible enough to maintain for engagement with broader audiences or future students. Nevertheless, the pilot project demonstrated that CAER is a promising approach for engaging students in anticipatory ethical reasoning. This research has been presented at conferences domestically and internationally with excellent reception, and we have just submitted an article for publication in Science and Engineering Ethics. Based on the success of this work, we now have a dedicated space to further develop CAER as a pedagogical innovation.

 

In addition to supporting the previously-piloted CAER module (reaching 4-5 sections of 25 students each), with a more expansive and interactive mode of engagement, these interactive labs will support a new CAER module for an additional course that we teach (another 4-5 sections of 25 students each) and for integration into two more courses in the curriculum (over 100 students). They will provide an interactive space to guide our capstone and independent study students in using CAER in their research

 

(currently, another 22 students), and provide an interactive space to engage our research subjects in a collaborative CAER research engagement that also involves undergraduate students. In other words, the development of these interactive AR labs would allow us to significantly scale up CAER and reach more students across a greater variety of learning engagements.

 

AR will allow us to draw digital overlays on top of material backgrounds (set pieces, board games, white boards, dioramas, etc.), adding a virtual third dimension to the interactive lab and enabling multiple students simultaneously to draw different overlays and to build on each other’s overlays in the digital space. Additionally, once these layers are created, specific instantiations can be associated with QR codes that other students can scan, facilitating nimble engagement with each other’s work.

 

The goals of these proposed interactive labs are to:

·         Teach students the scenario analysis process with flexible, iterative scenario development, simultaneous engagement with multiple groups, and greater individual participation

·         Guide students in the creative elaboration of diverse scenarios and the use of design fiction to collaboratively engage the social and ethical implications of these diverse scenarios

·         Facilitate greater interaction among students engaging each other’s design fictions and ethical reflections through QR codes that link to each other’s work

·         Scale up to include a greater number of students incorporating anticipatory ethical reasoning across a wider set of courses and learning experiences

·         Achieve a sustainable CAER lab that requires minimal financial investment per engagement

 

Plan for design and implementationThe two interactive AR labs will consist of several stations that guide students through different parts of the CAER process. There will be multiple starting points to facilitate different groups engaging the interactive labs at the same time. These interactive labs will be constructed using a combination of wood board games and backdrops designed and laser cut using technology at XLabs, magnetized white boards, game pieces and magnetized figures 3D printed in XLabs, and several additional required elements purchased with the support of the ACT Grant, including iPADs to support drawing and overlaying Augmented Reality creations onto the Lab backdrops. Additional props can be created for free using 3D printing and other resources available through the on-campus makeries. Our current lab students will help us to construct these labs and test them for optimal flow and effectiveness. Items in bold require the financial assistance of the ACT grant.

 

Phase 1. Introduction to CAER: The Basics Station 1: Eight Key Questions with Science Tarot

Station 2: Driver analysis with AR-enhanced board game. Board game cards: Technology Cards, Driver Cards, Systems Cards, Stakeholder Cards.

Station 3: Design Fiction with Wired Magazine

Station 4: Introduction to AR / VR (Merge / Oculus Go)

 

Phase 2. Application of Scenario Analysis (AR over whiteboards)

Station 1: Digital scenario analysis choose-your-own-adventure interactive

 

Station 2: Selection of key drivers and stakeholder power/interest grid with AR over magnetic whiteboard enabling 3D printed magnet guides.

Station 3: Prioritization and plotting of key drivers with AR over magnetic whiteboard. Station 4: Scenario Crosses with AR over whiteboard/corkboard.

 

Phase 3. Application of Design Fiction (AR over backdrops)

Four stations: Each will have a different AR backdrop to scaffold design fiction overlays—for example, a (3D printed) mannequin backdrop, an urban city backdrop, a landscape backdrop, and a blank backdrop. Design fiction creation requires iPad and apple pencil.

 

Phase 4: Application of Ethical Reasoning

8 Key Question mapping and analysis using AR overlay on design fiction overlay.

 

Phase 5: Interaction and Reflection

Engage each other’s work by scanning QR codes to see group AR overlays. Reflection.

 

Research design/data analysis

We have an existing IRB for the CAER process that we would renew and amend to include a broader group of students, updated pre- and post-questions, and analysis of new kinds of artifacts. In addition to pre- and post-tests of students, we will analyze the products of student work and student reflections. Our current IRB also allows for follow-up interviews.

 

Outcome of the innovative and creative teaching

After participating in the above-described interactive labs, students will be able to:

  • Identify and analyze implicit assumptions and values that inform expectations about technological progress, universal benefit, and inevitability
  • Translate independent research into the component parts of a scenario analysis
  • Apply scenario analysis to analyze plausible future sociotechnical trajectories
  • Apply ethical reasoning to assess potential mid- to long-term implications of a technology
  • Identify and analyze the roles of uncertainty, expertise, and risk in technology governance

 

For some learning contexts, additional outcomes include:

  • Facilitate scenario analysis workshops
  • Use AR and digital media to communicate about science, technology, and society

 

Plan for result dissemination

We recently received NSF funding to host a workshop at JMU next summer on “STS as a Critical Pedagogy.” We will present our work at this workshop, and invite workshop participants to experience CAER themselves with these interactive labs. We will also create a digital essay with images and artifacts from the process for a new collaborative digital platform (STS Infrastructures) associated with our discipline and professional organization, where we have recently created a new STS Pedagogies group.

We will notify members of our new STS Pedagogies Listserv about this as well. We will develop a publication the Engaging STS journal, and likely present on this at the Conference on Higher Education Pedagogy and at the annual 4S meeting, as well as the Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum meeting.

 

PLEASE NOTE: The COVID-19 Pandemic altered the original implementation timeline. The authors will share additional information about the project in the future!

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Creative Teaching Cases - A Collection that Inspires Copyright © 2023 by James Madison University Faculty is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book